This articel focuses on the interpretation of Indonesian education
elites on the education ideology represented in the politics of
education which takes the form of National education System Bill Number
20 Year 2003. It is based on a research which concerned a couple of
question: 1) how did Indonesian education elites interpret the
foundation, curriculum and management of national education? 2) is
Indonesian ideology of education categorized in O'Neill's education
ideology theory, and why? The research used two main theories:
(1)
O'Neill'education ideology theory, dialectic theory, and (2) Putnam
theory on elite identification. There were ten informants in the
researcg, and the data collected was in the form of statue document and
interview transcript. Individual analysis unit used human instrument.
The data were analyzed using Strauss and Corbin model. The research
resulted in two main findings. First, based on the interpretation of
Indonesian educational elites, the foundation, curriculum and management
of national education were considered to have the characteristics of
both social conservative ideology and liberal ideology. Second, based on
the strategic interpretation and positional cluster of Indonesian
educational elites, Indonesian educational ideology could be categorized
into conservative ideology, while based on the non strategic
interpretation and reputation cluster, the ideology could be included in
compromistic liberal ideology.
http://library.um.ac.id/majalah/index.php?s_data=bp_index&id=43101&mod=b&cat=3
0 comments:
Post a Comment